Do we really need LibreOffice installed by default?

Máirín Duffy duffy at fedoraproject.org
Thu Sep 18 11:57:35 UTC 2014



On 09/18/2014 05:27 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> I am not sure bringing back package selection [1] in Anaconda is a step
> in the right direction. I'd rather have all customization done
> post-install through GNOME Software and keep the first installation
> experience as straightforward as possible.
>
> In fact, I would like Anaconda to completely hide the software selection
> spoke when there is nothing optional to choose, as is (was?) the case
> with Workstation.

We (the team working on the Anaconda UI rewrite) explicitly excluded 
package-level selection for UX reasons (the way RPM & depsolving works 
it basically lies to users and can never meet the expectations the UI 
necessarily has to set) and I think bringing it back is a no-go. If we 
wanted to build some kind of tool for tweakers that lets you do package 
level selection and then builds an image, I think that would be the 
right way to solve that issue. Anaconda is too limited an environment 
for users to have the information they need to make informed selections 
and it's also too limited an environment to properly set expectations 
about the dep-based nature of RPM and how what you select and de-select 
in the UI doesn't mean the thing you de-selected isn't going to be 
present....

Would love for the software selection spoke to be completely hidden when 
there's nothing to choose. We hide it in live install images IIRC.

~m


More information about the desktop mailing list