<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/25/2013 07:59 AM, Christian
Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1385384346.14644.4.camel@dhcp129-40.brq.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi everyone,
First of all apologize for this taking so long, I ended up traveling
non-stop for some time visiting some of Red Hats desktop customers.
While not directly tied to the work of this working group I do hope to
take some of the lessons learned from those meetings with me into the
future work of the working group.
Anyway I tried editing the PRD a bit based on the feedback we got on the
first draft. I tried to make a few items a bit clearer and also to
include spelling fixes contributed and so on.
We probably want to do another WG meeting soon to discuss next steps.
Feel free to let me know if I forgot to include some important feedback
or if further clarifications are needed.
Christian
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
The "
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Overall plans and policies for the product" section contains a
mixture of high-level goals (e.g. "Robust Upgrades"
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="LibreOffice 4.1.3.2 (Linux)">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin: 0.79in }
P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }
A:link { so-language: zxx }
-->
</style>) and implementation suggestions (e.g. "Container Based
Application Install"). Would it be better to spilt this section up,
defining the high-level goals, and then listing the potential
implementation suggestions and how they could possibly contribute to
achieving the goal(s)?<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
ryanlerch<br>
</body>
</html>