<div dir="ltr">Hi<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Liam <span dir="ltr"><</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr"></p>In not sure this would constitute a "significant " change, but assuming it were, can you point to where this decision has been formally stated? I'm certainly aware that Fedora is upstream first, but I believe we carry patches in cases where we have to. <br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>The general guidance is to avoid this as much as possible<br><br><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects</a> <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">
That may not be appropriate in this particular case but I think the needs of the Fedora project have to come before upstream.</p></blockquote><div> Divergence may not be necessary and is always a maintenance burden. So you work primarily in the space of upstream projects for core development and focus within Fedora should be as a point of integration and projects/infrastructure that help with that.<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Rahul <br></div></div></div></div></div>