<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<div class=""><br>
> Some "advance(?)" users disable it anyway, less advance users don't know why<br>
> their apps fail while app developers ignore it.<br>
<br>
</div>Which apps fail? The majority of apps run unconfined. There might be<br>
bugs but generally SELinux just allows apps<br>
to what there are supposed to do and nothing more instead of leaving<br>
apps just do everything.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Fedora Bugzilla has a nice list with applications/programs that do not work as have to because of SELinux</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=""><br>
> Moreover the latest bug found on Fedora 20 with SELinux/Scriptlets made the<br>
> recovery totally impossible for many users,<br>
> and it proved (again) that SELinux isn't a really good software for desktop<br>
> and desktop users.<br>
<br>
</div>That's a bug ... "we hit a bug so disable it" is simply wrong we<br>
should find out why the testing failed<br>
to catch that bug and improve that instead.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is not just a bug. This is one more bug. There is a constant series of major bugs since Fedora 15 (when I started use Fedora).</div><div>When a software isn't working for so long, try to fixing it is not the only direction. Specially for users.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Anyway, I just brought up something I consider not good for Fedora.</div><div>I guess you know better what to do! </div><div><br></div><div>- alex</div><div> </div></div><br></div></div>