<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Richard Hughes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com" target="_blank">hughsient@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 20 August 2014 18:45, drago01 <<a href="mailto:drago01@gmail.com">drago01@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> 64x64 is too small for high dpi screens (its the same as 32x32 for non<br>
> hidpi screen) if "64x64" is your aim ask for 128x128.<br>
<br>
</div>That would push the icon tarball from 6Mb to over 25Mb. I'm happy<br>
doing both sizes for hidpi, but I think an easier fix is just to scale<br>
the icons double size in the hidpi case in the client.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Richard.<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">--<br>
desktop mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org">desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I think apps should ship with both 64x64 and 128x128, and Software should use the 64x64 ones still.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">-Elad Alfassa.</div>
</div></div>