<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
On 08/30/2014 10:42 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">> On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 19:22
+0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:<br>
>> I really don't undertand why "not installing the release
notes" is<br>
>> such a big change we need to wait for the next cycle to
implement.<br>
>> It's really just a one line change. And if we want to
install them but<br>
>> not provide a launcher (so they could be opened by a
bookmark in<br>
>> Firefox) than I'd happily provide a patch to split the
launcher to a<br>
>> subpackage.<br>
><br>
> Eh, I'm just picking my battles here. A Release Notes
launcher that<br>
> starts Firefox is not good and we should get rid of it, but
it's not<br>
> very bad either and if the release notes people want another
cycle to<br>
> rethink how to present the release notes, well why not let
them have it?<br>
><br>
> Another thing we could do is add it as a default web app.
GNOME Software<br>
> requires "epiphany-runtime" which is all of Epiphany except
the desktop<br>
> file, so that it can install and remove web apps. Well, why
not make the<br>
> release notes a web app -- then the release notes team gets
to keep the<br>
> desktop launcher, and we are happy since it's a real
application.<br>
><br>
></span><br>
<br>
Someone had proposed that in #fedora-docs late yesterday, I like
it. I'm working on some copy right now, and will go for an
ephiphany web-app style presentation in GNOME for the next RPM.<br>
<br>
For the record, the collaboration part of my arguments here are
*far* more important to me than the actual inclusion of a Release
Notes RPM. It's a valid discussion, and I would much rather start
on that basis, instead of potentially missing a discussion about a
design philosophy on a SIG list, then finding out about the impact
when I learn that an RC isn't meeting release criteria because of my
package.<br>
<br>
- -- <br>
- -- Pete Travis<br>
- Fedora Docs Project Leader<br>
- 'randomuser' on freenode<br>
- <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:immanetize@fedoraproject.org">immanetize@fedoraproject.org</a><br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUAgFYAAoJEL1wZM0+jj2ZfXYH/A6jnJh2qnZMqMcggGjamzg4<br>
k2tQQoT/Imx9HF3ZEebs2WlS1w2b8HVg/WBFx0joGXMV9iER8TeFQSOLndy7Col1<br>
vmO44BtWCUJfHG6valf+g+mnXuMMeVLsPy707axSKR/glctRakD1msXiyqpz/IxF<br>
CxFJGennU4f2ypXAPszk6SS26MkIJuY+nyB/5CDN1NAW5yWgPQ8xTH/xxPt6Imnm<br>
KycuexVq4MrmtPO7R0VdThavxJLf9GaAR0Exv/HqJXuEhKrxsAmTMOsPsxKWyZR3<br>
aNPGb5XDfeIz3eAkUdI7goKTxYDaeVD5sW0KxXDBBdTKnbyCK7MSpjoI3wDfB5k=<br>
=0JZ2<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>