Fedora Core 2 wishlists
Michael K. Johnson
johnsonm at redhat.com
Mon Dec 8 17:41:19 UTC 2003
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:04:18AM -0500, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:14:59AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > gnome 2.6
> While I don't want to discount this, I'd like to state here the
> problem with it. GNOME is basically on a 6-month cycle. We are
> So even if we were to pick up GNOME 2.6 this time, we would have
> the same discussion every release until we bit the bullet.
Apparantly I wasn't clear. GNOME 2.6 is not overruled -- I just
wanted to have the arguments for both sides on the table. It is
still very much an option worth discussing.
"He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book."
Linux Application Development -- Ben Franklin
More information about the devel