Fedora security announce and discussion lists

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mar 30/09/2003 à 05:42, Nathan G. Grennan a écrit :

>    This idea came to be because of the issue with running things from
> rawhide has always been a security risk. You never know when the
> maintainer will make a new rawhide package with the necessary security
> fix for the latest exploits. 

Rawhide was/is ok. It's fast-paced enough (except during betas of
course;() one can just to a regular apt-dist-upgrade and get all the
security fixes (a lot of fixes for core are tested in rawhide first
anyway). An up-to-date rawhide is not much a security risk I feel - it
breaks enough regular software it should also break most exploits;)

OTOH, I've always felt nervous about fedora.us(...) packages. There are
too many conflicts with Rawhide one could auto-update  them blindly, at
the risk of getting things stale like you noted.

I do hope the new Fedora project will try to get more in sync wit
Rawhide.

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20030930/988f0edf/attachment-0002.bin