Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE

[Arjan van de Ven]

> 	Hopefully, when we have a real process for external developers it'll
> only be a matter of a developer saying "I think this should be
> backported, okay if I go ahead?" and the developer at least doing a good
> chunk of the work rather than stuff like this blocking on the amount of
> time a given developer has available.

except that for fedora the goal is(was) to ship newer versions instead
of doing complex backports, right ?
Which makes it even less work to be honest.

(ok there are exceptions, the gray area probably is releasing a 2.6
kernel for FC1)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040803/52c79785/attachment-0002.bin