Yet again: several missing update announcements
nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk
Mon Jun 27 09:26:10 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:57 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Sure :-) My mail wasn't really a complaint, I just tried to explain
> to the majority of the people outside of Red Hat and who don't deal with
> our internal system what is happening, and why. The fact that step 4
> is asynchronous to me is nearly unavoidable since it requires PGP signing
> of the packages and "some" centralized manual checking is needed.
Is there no way that the announcement (stage 4) be written ahead of time
- ie with the push into stage 3 - with replaceable blocks for the
information that will change (MD5s and the like). An automatic process
would then fill in the blanks.
More information about the devel