kde4 status?

Josh Boyer jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Sun Aug 19 00:54:54 UTC 2007


On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:24:06 -0500
Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:

> Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:01:29 +0200
> > Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:
> > 
> >> Michel Salim wrote:
> >> > On 18/08/07, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> Today I've started working on packaging a kde game, ksirk.
> >> >> Upstream has a beta version available which uses kde4, I thought
> >> >> that would be a good place to start. However much to my
> >> >> suprise, I couldn't find any kde4 packages in rawhide.
> >> >>
> >> >> So whats the statud on this, eta? Anything I can do to help? Any
> >> >> place where I can download test packages (even if those are to
> >> >> rough for rawhide)?
> >> >>
> >> > I'm not sure KDE4 is slated for inclusion for F8; their release
> >> > schedule is too closed to that of F8 to accomodate any slippage.
> >> > 
> >> > I believe there are some KDE4 packages being worked on, that can
> >> > be parallel-installable, but I don't think KDE4-based packages
> >> > can be accepted into the distribution unless KDE4 itself is.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Grumbel, now that was a very usefull answer (NOT) can people please
> >> refrain from answering questions about things which they have no
> >> clue about, and instead go RTFM? (kde4 is planned for F-8
> >> inclusion), see:
> > 
> > Actually, Michael does have a clue.
> > 
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/FeatureList
> > 
> > Yes, that is out of date.
> > 
> >> and notice how KDE4 is on the approved features list, and:
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureKDE4
> > 
> > As is this.
> > 
> > KDE4 will not be in F8. 
> 
> Absolute and final decisions have not been made, so I'd say that
> previous statement may be a bit misleading.

Perhaps.

> What *will* happen for sure:
> * Both kde3 and kde4 runtimes and development environments will be
> included in f8.

If it's not in test2, it's not a Feature.  Now that isn't a carved in
stone rule, but it's definitely a pretty decent guideline.

> Will probably happen:
> *  kde4 runtime/development landing in rawhide in time for test2
> (*crosses fingers*)

That would be nice.  If for some reason it fails to happen by test2,
are you still going to attempt to push it into f8?  If so, why?

> Undecided:
> *  the kde4 desktop environment is, at present, still unstable and

Forgive my ignorance on the subject, but is "kde4 desktop" different
from "kde4 runtime"?

josh




More information about the devel mailing list