portage vs yum

[Leszek Matok]

Dnia 27-06-2007, śro o godzinie 17:30 -0400, seth vidal napisał(a):
> It doesn't notify you that it is 'updating for dependencies'?  Can you
> give me a test case so I can look at it?
I was talking about upgrading a library and breaking dependencies.
Kevin's right, though, it's fixed in 3.2.1, I haven't upgraded my
Rawhide for few days now, so I stand corrected.

An open question: is there a way to make yum update my rawhide, when
there are broken dependencies in the repos? Apt gives me "upgrade" which
upgrades only packages that can be upgraded, leaving out a small subset
of packages with broken interdependencies. Apt also gives me
"dist-upgrade", which removes packages that would otherwise keep others
from upgrading, depending on older versions. Not to mention apt-shell,
where I can decide on a per-package basis. Yum, OTOH, simply refuses to
upgrade at all, spitting some depsolving errors. Going for "yum install
<list of 100 packages>" isn't an option, you know :)

Lam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= listu
	podpisana cyfrowo
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070628/74243713/attachment-0002.bin