Proposal ocaml guidelines
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Fri May 4 00:40:37 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 21:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Okay,
>
> The proposal I mailed to the list yesterday is now available here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml
>
Thanks Hans!
I have a question about bytecode/native code. Should the guidelines
specify that module packages build both bytecode and native code? As a
precedent, a java library will install a native code version to
%{_libdir}/libfoo-1.0.so and byte code to /usr/share/java/foo-1.0.jar.
I also wonder if we want to specify that ocaml programs should be
compiled to native code.
> If you can let me know where and when the FPC meeting happens, then I can see
> if I can attend (times in CET please, as a european I'm not used to doing
> timezone calculations)
>
I believe that tibbs answered this.
Thanks,
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070503/2f9f6287/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list