Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (bz#230262)
Margaret Lum
mlum at redhat.com
Thu May 10 21:57:34 UTC 2007
Warren Togami wrote:
> Right, unsigned in Fedora. Proprietary or 3rd party apps needing a
> signed JAR would need to provide it from a separate source. Can you
> confirm that it could be parallel installed without much trouble?
There won't be any need for this, as developers can sign at their own
discretion.
>
>>>
>>> Red Hat (the company) could (pending legal approval) choose to
>>> proceed with this as part of an internal product. But as the rules
>>> stand today, Fedora cannot ship this signed.
>> We will ship this UNsigned, in Fedora. Can approval be re-evaluated?
>
> Right, yes it can.
Please let me know what the next steps to working this through the
approval committee expediently. I want to make sure there aren't
details omitted that would hinder this package from being approved.
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3229 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070510/9ba9082a/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list