Suggestions for F9
Trever L. Adams
trever.adams at gmail.com
Sun Nov 18 12:33:29 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 07:53 +0000, Keith Sharp wrote:
> I agree that a CalDAV compliant calendaring server would be a great
> addition to Fedora, but is the Darwin Calendar Server the best one to
> focus attention on? As far as I am aware there are at least three other
> servers we could consider:
> I am not following development of any of these, so I cannot comment on
> which would be best for Fedora, but it would be worth doing a review
> before focusing on one implementation.
I had seen these before. I do not think I want chandler or rscds. The
later doesn't fully implement the protocol yet. It may never do so.
Chandler seems much too heavy.
Bedework may be a win. It may actually be better than Darwin Calendar
(which is what I suggested).
Anyone have any ideas on which would be best?
"Life is what happens to you when you're busy making other plans." --
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071118/d35e9f87/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel