long term support release
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Jan 23 15:33:36 UTC 2008
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:13:39 -0500
David Mansfield <fedora at dm.cobite.com> wrote:
> I think Fedora LTS would be:
> - planned and built into the Fedora cycle and finally implemented
> - only releases planned in advance to be LTS releases would be LTS
> - there would only be one (or two) outstanding LTS releases at a time
And you create the same problem. They won't be frequent enough to
support today's hardware, and also if you constantly just do new
versions of everything you lose the ability to support it long term as
too much churn breaks things.
To be fair, RHEL/CentOS does do limited hardware enablement in the
update releases, like 5.0, 5.1, etc...
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080123/44a8c60f/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel