/bin/mail replacement (next generation of mailx)
nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk
Thu Jun 12 07:58:17 UTC 2008
On 11 Jun 2008, at 16:06, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>> This looks good, but on a minimal system how many other packages
>> would be pulled in as dependancies over the existing mailx?
> For now, "openssl" (or "nss") and "krb5-libs". Is it OK for a minimal
Both of those ought to be on a system anyhow (openssh would need them).
I was concerned that things like imap support could pull in a pile of
other deps, but that sets my mind at rest wrt bloating the minimal
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
More information about the devel