mschwendt at gmail.com
Tue May 6 12:55:23 UTC 2008
On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:46:45 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 07:24:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Indeed, in my experience the entire POINT of a -libs subpackage is that
> > > it doesn't pull in the whole base package. If it does, why are you
> > > bothering to create a separate libs subpackage? So the review guidelines
> > > are indisputably broken here.
> > -libs, even if Require'ing the base pkg, helps multilib-wise.
> If -libs requires base pkg, there's no need to split the two.
> And it cannot help multilib-wise, because the -devel => -libs => base pkg
> chain is still intact.
Unless RPM doesn't care about the arch of the base pkg... and takes
either one, ... oh well...
More information about the devel