starting Fedora Server SIG
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Nov 13 14:24:15 UTC 2008
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:20:41AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:12:24AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Chuck Anderson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
> >>> Crucial thing is static IPs which NM can't handle.
> >>
> >> False.
> >
> > If you bring up a mix of static and dynamically assigned interfaces, can
> > you control which gets to assign the default route and DNS servers?
>
> The last time I looked at the code, NM had a hard-coded policy for how
> it assigns the default route and DNS servers. If you only have one
> interface with a default route and the other interfaces don't have a
> default route, then the DNS and default route for that interface is
> set. If you have more than one, I believe it picks based on the
> hard-coded policy, which I believe is wired first, then wireless, then
> dialup/mobile broadband. In the face of multiple wired connections,
> I'm not sure what the policy is.
>
> Yes, NM needs to grow the ability to specify policy outside of the
> code.
>
> It also needs IPv6 support (coming soon I hear)
Unless it has been broken again, IPv6 'just works' in NM if you are using
IPv6 auto-configuration. NM ensures every interface has a link local
address for IPv6, so the moment any interface is up and on a network
with IPv6 enabled it'll automatically get suitable addressing.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the devel
mailing list