Moblin 2 and Fedora

[Rahul Sundaram]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:32:25 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>>> If there was a "based on" relationship we would. But it's not
>>> nearly so simple.
>> That would depend on what of Moblin came from Fedora and what changes 
>> Intel made. I wouldn't dismiss the possibility so easily.
> 
> I don't dismiss anything beforehand, and am quite open to discuss just
> about anything.
> 
> But frankly, if I look at where things are today in Moblin and where
> they are going; the packages we borrowed from Fedora tend to be those
> where we don't do much if any changes. 
> If there's something specific that the Fedora project wants to get from
> Moblin we should discuss that, but lets be specific there rather than
> having a discussion on the blanket hand-wavey level...

It has to remain hand-wavey until we get to know about what changes have 
been made. If there is no changes, then there is nothing further to 
discuss.

Rahul