rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 à 11:49 -0500, Chris Adams a écrit :
> Once upon a time, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> said:
> > Really we just need the moral equivalent of %exclude for autoreqprovs.
> 
> Yeah, I said that years and years ago, but RPM didn't want it.  Having
> many many packages with their own hacked versions of scripts to exclude
> autoreqprovs is silly (and a maintenance mess).

File triggers are based on the same idea.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090617/70a73c1d/attachment.bin