Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide
Jeffrey Ollie
jeff at ocjtech.us
Tue Sep 8 13:17:55 UTC 2009
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Benny Amorsen<benny+usenet at amorsen.dk> wrote:
>
> Patch1: 0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch
> Patch2: 0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch
> Patch5: 0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch
> Patch6: 0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch
> Patch8: 0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch
> Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch
> Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch
> Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch
Heh, see the latest builds in F-11/rawhide. The rawhide packages
should be on the mirrors now, the F-11 build should be showing up
shortly. I basically did the same thing as you.
> I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1
> versions, just to make them apply.
Yeah, fortunately it was less work than I thought. I've really grown
to depend on git's merging/rebasing/cherry-picking abilities.
Hopefully my git mirror of the asterisk svn will finish rebuilding
soon. Digium may also be putting up a semi-official git mirror as
well.
> I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in
> asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in.
Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking when I added it in.
> I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in 6
> months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use
> Lua.
>
> Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream...
Yeah, it's a matter of time/energy. Plus a couple of them really need
some polishing before they would even be considered.
--
Jeff Ollie
More information about the devel
mailing list