Request for Comments: Fedora Project Contributor Agreement Draft (Replacement for Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreement)

[Sir Gallantmon (ニール・ゴンパ)]

But it should be explicitly stated anyway. Legalese isn't English.
Note: IANAL

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Matt McCutchen <matt at mattmccutchen.net>wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote:
> > i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn't see any explicit reference
> > to source code! (e.g. , that it must be made available.)
>
> Indeed.  For an MIT licensing regime to be considered "free", the
> original author must provide the source.  But being non-copyleft, the
> license does not require distributors of derived works to provide
> source.
>
> I can't imagine Fedora accepting a contribution in binary form, so I
> believe this is a non-issue.
>
> --
> Matt
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100422/9f5bec5f/attachment.html