Add mercurial to development group?

[Brian Pepple]

On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 00:21 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.04.2010, 15:41 -0400 schrieb Neal Becker:
> 
> > IMO, mercurial should have the same status as git.  git is default.  Should 
> > we take a vote?
> 
> -1 on mercurial then

-1 here also.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100428/7781448f/attachment.bin