Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:

> I think the responsibility of these things should be placed upon the
> SIG members who perform the functions from within these different
> groups. Why not have a QA person from each SIG work together with the
> larger QA efforts instead of potentially against them?

If a spin wants to use a modified kernel package, what's the procedure 
for ensuring that it receives the same level of QA as the normal kernel?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org