On 13/02/10 05:18, Adam Williamson wrote: --snipped-- >> Want to help us come up with a term we could use to reference this tree? >> Email away! > > Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't > really need to have its own name that's always the same... +2 Easier tell the pecking order. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded