FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:16 -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 2/26/2010 11:07, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people
> > consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part
> > of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a
> > smoke test.  Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box
> > that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more
> > direct relationship.  Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services
> > initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing
> > stuff.
> 
> Forgive me if I'm missing something, but isn't that QA's job?  Maybe 
> what we really need is a push for more QA people.

QA is an engineering service, and a volunteer effort.  The Fedora
Engineering Services initiative seems to fit that role.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/8fcf241d/attachment.bin