Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Mon Jan 11 22:59:10 UTC 2010
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:43:32 +0000
Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk> wrote:
> This is a bit suspicious:
>
> 2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>:
> >
> > orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla
> > orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla10
> >
>
> Why is it necessary for xquilla to distribute the source for xerces-c?
> Why is a simple dependency on xerces-c-devel not sufficient? :-/
Looks like from: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376541
"xqilla101 source rpm also includes sources of xerces-c -- XQilla build
process relies on few xerces-c include files that are not present in standard xerces-c-devel
package."
but someone should finish the end of life process for
these packages if it's not picked up by someone.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
So they are no longer shipped.
Looks like more than a year since the former maintainer touched the
packages.
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100111/4fd57ec1/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list