Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > > > Greetings package maintainers,
> > > >
> > > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > > > packages?  This includes results of rpmlint [1],
> > > 
> > > Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its 
> > > results are mostly noise.
> > 
> > Which packages do you maintain where the output has become unmanageable?
> 
> For myself, I really only think that the spell checks are intolerable. 

I think a number of the checks are probably not useful - but I also
think we'll learn more about which ones as we get feedback from
packagers getting these emails.

I think the goal is, of course, to reduce the noise out and focus on
making sure the packagers know about the truly broken. :)

-sv