bodhi statistics

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:58:15AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On 06/09/2010 10:48 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>   
>>> Well the only person I see mentioning quality is Kevin. And for some
>>> reason he is expecting it immediately
>>>     
>> You can't claim that there are "shortcomings in our testing" (the exact 
>> words Luke used!) without a metric of quality. A shortcoming in testing 
>> means less testing was done than needed. If the packages have good quality, 
>> that means more testing is NOT needed, no matter what the actual amount of 
>> testing was.
>>   
>
>Packages without any testing is of unknown quality.   If someone doesn't
>test them before pushing, users are unknowingly playing that role. 

That is true if you are making the assumption that the package maintainer did
no testing themselves.  I would hope that isn't the common case.

josh