libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

[Chen Lei]

2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes <richmattes at gmail.com>:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
>> > Rawhide [1].  I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
>> > obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
>> > Unfortunately, when it pulls in dependencies for my other BuildRequires,
>> > it's trying to pull in libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo, and I get a conflict
>> > since they both provide libjpeg.so.62.0.0
>> >
>> > The only thing I can think of is that one of the packages I'm requiring
>> > has an explicit dep on libjpeg (I'm about to investigate which).  For
>> > the time being, is there any to work around this?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Rich
>> >
>> > [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
>> >
>> > --
>>
>> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607554
>
> Why doesn't  libjpeg-turbo  contain the proper Obsoletes for libjpeg?
>
> Only libjpeg-turbo-devel does it correctly for libjpeg-devel and
> libjpeg-static.
>
> That's only half of the show. libjpeg-turbo is meant to replace libjpeg,
> so it should obsolete it. And if it also added the "Provides", there
> would be no need to rebuild dependencies, but considering that this is
> Rawhide, okay if it doesn't add the "Provides".
> --

libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils. I don't know why
Rich's package failed to build on koji,  the problem is a bit weird.
Among 5 packages which require libjpeg explicitly, only
java-1.6.0-openjdk will be used as a BR, however Rich's packages is
irrelevant to java.  FYI, provides libjpeg is also add to
libjpeg-turbo-utils now, I don't know if it can solve the file
conflicts.
Chen Lei