tor dependency insanity.
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Mar 2 18:22:46 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:14 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:51:17AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:37 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > --> Processing Dependency: tor-lsb = 0.2.1.23-1200.fc12 for package:
> > > tor-0.2.1.23-1200.fc12.i686
> >
> > This is where things go to hell. Why in the hell is tor-lsb /required/
> > by tor? LSB isn't really good for anything except landing a bunch of
> > crap on your system that you don't really want there. Making it
> > required is rather... lame.
>
> Why do we even bother supporting bullshit standards like LSB ?
>
> We should make a stand and drop it from Fedora until it's not made up of
> bonghits and failure. (haha, yeah. thanks, here all week, etc)
I'm not quite sure why it needs separate lsb/upstart init scripts
anyway. Don't most of our packages just include one initscript with both
bits in the headers?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the devel
mailing list