FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 01:34 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Even bugfix releases of KDE require a session restart to fully work.
> 
> I consider that a serious design flaw in KDE and a strong argument against 
> releasing any KDE updates to stable releases other than fixes for serious bugs. 
> The only practical way to keep up with the Fedora update firehose is to update 
> every day and let the update run in the background while I'm working. If I put 
> it off until I'm about to turn the computer off, then the updates will 
> accumulate and updating will take a long time when I finally do it. I might not 
> have the time to sit around and wait for the update to finish so that I can 
> turn the computer off, so I'll put it off again, and when the next opportunity 
> comes the list of updates will have grown even more. That's a vicious circle I 
> don't want to get into.
> 

We do need a "apply all updates and shut down" option.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100302/7da618a7/attachment.bin