Refining the update queues/process [Was: Worthless updates]

[Seth Vidal]

On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> Seth Vidal wrote:
>> At the risk of complicating the world would it make any sense for us to
>> have (in increasing order of importance)
>>
>> updates-testing
>> updates
>> updates-important
>>
>> packages that are security or critical go from updates-testing to
>> updates-important - and that happens as necessary
>>
>> all other updates go from updates-testing to updates once a month.
>
> And what problem would that solve? All I see is it causes problems for those
> people who need the updates you don't judge "important".

And stages non-critical/important updates so our QA team can test and 
check them over more thoroughly and align testing goals and days to help 
foster and create a more active and involved testing infrastructure.

This is what we HAVE to do.

-sv