Proposed udpates policy change

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> 
> > I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path
> > policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still
> > allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable.
> 
> That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the
> critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc.
> but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. I don't
> personally care if KDE is updated 20 times a week, or about other
> packages that aren't installed by default being rebased often.

The current critical path does include most of that. You can see the
current critpath list at:

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100309/logs/critpath.txt

It's generated daily, it's not a static list. It does currently include
most of the important bits of GNOME, and cups-libs.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net