Proposed udpates policy change
Matthew Garrett
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Mar 9 19:43:43 UTC 2010
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:10:04PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 2) Updates that constitute a part of the 'important' package set (defined
> below) must follow the rules as defined for critical path packages for
> pending releases, meaning that they require positive karma from releng
> and/or QA before they go stable. This also includes security updates for
> these packages.
>
> The 'important' package set is defined as the following:
> - The current critical path package set
> - All major desktop environments' core functionality (GNOME, KDE, XFCE,
> LXDE)
> - Package updating frameworks (gnome-packagekit, kpackagekit)
> - Major desktop productivity apps. An initial list would be firefox,
> kdebase (konqueror), thunderbird, evolution, kdepim (kmail).
How about every package that's installed by default in the primary
spins?
> Comments, questions, reasoned arguments? Part of me wonders if this should be
> expanded with a sliding scale for update types (enhancements, for example, get
> more stringent treatment than bugfix/security).
This seems pretty sane.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the devel
mailing list