QA's Package update policy proposal

[James Laska]

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:41 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > If you - and the QA team - want to expand your testing activities, focus
> > on the CRITPATH packages first. Do a good job there. Nobody from QA has
> > ever given feedback to any of my updates, and it won't happen in the
> > future either.
> 
> 
> I would not be opposed to the above.
> Make the system work on critpath then mandate it from everyone else.

That's a sensible approach, I don't see any harm in using critpath as
the proving ground.

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100309/f5be40f7/attachment.bin