Push scripts, mash (was: Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback))
skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Thu Mar 11 17:23:53 UTC 2010
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> as long as you require only a few 32-bit packages, requesting them
>> explicitly is not the end of the world. So if we were to drop support
>> for that "always install all libs as multilibs" option
> Eh? I didn't even know there was such an option. And I agree, /that/
> should be dropped.
man yum.conf; /multilib_policy
it is set to best in fedora.
>> and require explicitly picking the wanted 32-bit stuff from the
>> 32-bit repo, that shouldn't be a real issue for you.
> As long as I can still install libs to build i*86 on my mostly-x86_64
> system, without yum getting confused and broken, then I'm okay. My
> concern is really just the "yum getting confused and broken" part. (I
> would prefer to not have to jump through hoops to get i*86 stuff,
> though, i.e. having to manually set up a repo would make me unhappy.)
the issue is not yum getting confused but really there being some
interesting conflicting files..
More information about the devel