Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Thomas Janssen]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Frank Murphy <frankly3d at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/03/10 11:56, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Frank Murphy<frankly3d at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On 12/03/10 11:33, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>>> -snipped--
>>>
>>> If I can be indulged.
>>>
>>>> it's because i can't believe that dial-up-land user are really that
>>>> stubborn
>>>
>>> It's not the endusers fault,
>>> they have bad infracture.
>>
>> Oh, so it's our fault?
>
> It's just life, in all it's forms.

Exactly. And if i live in an area where i cant have everything, i
can't choose everything.

>>
>>> and use Fedora
>>> Because that is what they want.
>>
>> I want a lot myself. Doesn't mean i can have everything. But i can
>> choose, as can they.
>
> They have, Fedora

Perfectly, so why do they complain then?

>>>   (and even worse try to change it)
>>> They also want to learn,
>>> maybe eventually be in a position
>>> to give back to the Fedora Community,
>>> and floss in general.
>>
>> They can give back with any other distro as well,
>
> True.
>
> that fits their needs better.
>
> So you say.

Well, all that complaining in this meag-threads makes it obvious that
Fedora doesn't fit their needs, don't you think ;)

>>>   instead of
>>>> using what fits their needs.
>>>
>>> Maybe Fedora is what fits their needs?
>>
>> Obviously not.
>
> You can't make that call for them.

See above.

-- 
LG Thomas

Dubium sapientiae initium