Stable Release Updates types proposal
Al Dunsmuir
al.dunsmuir at sympatico.ca
Sat Mar 13 00:19:19 UTC 2010
Friday, March 12, 2010, 7:02:54 PM, Kevin wrote:
> Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> Maybe part of the answer is that some resources (especially
>> automation) need to be dedicated to keep the core critical components
>> of rawhide from being gratuitously broken and staying that way?
> An answer to what question? Certainly not to the points I made!
> The problem is not with gratuitous breakage, but with breakage inherent to a
> rolling branch such as Rawhide.
> Kevin Kofler
And turning all releases into rolling branches helps keep things
sane?
Please call a spade a spade. Without a reduction in churn in the stable
releases that is what they become and remain until EOL - a rolling branch.
More information about the devel
mailing list