Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 03/31/2010 01:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a
>> cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix
>> a bug having hit a user.
>>
>> In other words: "FIXED UPSTREAM" does not fix anything for the user
>> struggling with a bug. It only helps the packager to keep his bug
>> statistics clean.
>>
>> Analogous considerations apply to "FIXED RAWHIDE"
>
> It's CLOSED UPSTREAM and CLOSED RAWHIDE, not FIXED UPSTREAM and FIXED
> RAWHIDE. CLOSED does not, necessarily, mean FIXED.
Then let me put it more bluntly: To a Fedora release's user, both tags 
are a slap into the face of "reporter" and mean "your bug will not be 
fixed".