Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Jaroslav Reznik]

On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:57:30 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:50:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > > which will make fixing bugs in current even more important.
> > > 
> > > Not at all.  Either the bug is important to fix in the current release
> > > or it is not.  Telling users to get it from Rawhide was never a valid
> > > resolution.  It is a workaround in some very small cases.
> > 
> > For example bug report - typo in SPEC file - it should be fixed in
> > Rawhide, but no need to push this update to current releases.
> 
> Well, I was thinking about example too, but for this case I usually fix all
> releases, and leave bug in modified. This way all people get the fix later
> when something more important comes.

This goes to current release every Rawhide sync (applies for KDE).

Jaroslav

> Michal

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/