RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Mon Nov 1 13:44:16 UTC 2010


On 29/10/10 04:15, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "JN" == Joe Nall<joe at nall.com>  writes:
>
> JN>  On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>>> More to the point, I can easily see the setuid bit easily on a
>>> binary.
>>> How do I tell if these strange/hidden "capabilities" are
>>> present on a binary?  'ls' doesn't mention anything.
>
> JN>  getcap
>
> Interesting.  That's in the libcap package, which is sort of oddly named
> because it includes executables.  And of course it's multilib, but the
> binaries are arch-specific which I believe is a multilib conflict.
> Probably needs the executables split out into a libcap-tools packages.
>
> I notice that rpm supports that %caps() directive in the %files list to
> specify capabilities.  I don't recall seeing that before; how long ago
> did rpm grow support for it?  It looks like it came in around rpm 4.7,
> so all supported Fedora releases have it.  However, I'm certain it's not
> in RHEL4 and I'm pretty sure it's not in RHEL5 either, so at least the
> EPEL folks will need to make a note of it.

I've just come across another issue with this. I use the "tmpfs" plugin 
with mock usually, and it appears that tmpfs doesn't support the 
necessary file capabilities, as I get these errors when setting up the 
buildroot:

DEBUG util.py:267:  Error unpacking rpm package 
iputils-20101006-2.fc15.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:267:  error: unpacking of archive failed on file 
/bin/ping: cpio: cap_set_file failed - Operation not supported
DEBUG util.py:267:  Error unpacking rpm package 
policycoreutils-2.0.83-32.fc15.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:267:  error: unpacking of archive failed on file 
/usr/sbin/seunshare: cpio: cap_set_file failed - Operation not supported

If I disable the tmpfs plugin, so mock uses the ext3 filesystem I have 
on /var/lib/mock, the build succeeds. So at least I have a workaround 
but I'd like to have tmpfs working as it *really* improves performance.

Paul.


More information about the devel mailing list