Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

[Bill Nottingham]

Andrew Haley (aph at redhat.com) said: 
> > and, most importantly, because it is NOT our job to work around bugs
> > in proprietary software!
> 
> How is any of that a reason not to patch glibc?
> 
> Upside of patching: happy users.
> Downside: nothing.

Downside: cranky libc maintainers

While possibly sometimes hard to distinguish from the default state, I'm
guessing that the chance of getting glibc upstream to change their behavior
for a closed-source app that broke semantics defined in K&R is nil, and they're
going to be pretty annoyed if we slam that in on top of them.

Bill