Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 14:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> I DON'T want to get an upgrade such as the one from KDE 3 to 4, the one from 
> Amarok 1 to 2, the one from KDevelop 3 to 4, the one from GNOME 2 to 3 etc. 
> as a regular update! Those are what new releases are for! (And there's your 
> "clear identity separation".) Minor feature release upgrades such as from 
> Amarok 2.2 to 2.3 (which DON'T have feature regressions, configuration 
> incompatibilites etc.), on the other hand, are perfectly fine to push as an 
> update, since they're clear improvements (and actually also fix bugs in 
> addition to adding features).

well, thanks for clarifying. I guess as you say then, the issue is just
defining what a potentially troublesome update is.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net