Git commit in all available branches

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000
Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400
> > "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" <forum at hubbitus.com.ru> wrote:
> > 
> > >  In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to
> > > make differences.
> > 
> > ...snip... 
> > 
> > I would hope a real reason would be that the update is not a
> > security or bugfix only update, right? 
> 
> IMHO it depends on what kind of software it is.
> 
> I push releases of applications to all current Fedora releases. The
> users want the new features, it's what they have been bugging me for.
> 
> If I was working on glibc or X I might not do that, but applications
> should be pushed back unless there is some system level constraint
> preventing it.
> 
> So I too would like a "commit to all branches" or "sync all branches
> to this one" command. 

If it doesn't change the user experience, and fixes bugs or security
issues, then great. ;) If it's a major update which does change the
user experience, breaks ABI/API, or adds a bunch of new functionality,
then please don't. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101011/3f5b155e/attachment.bin