Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting :: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
John Poelstra
poelstra at redhat.com
Mon Sep 13 19:15:27 UTC 2010
John Poelstra said the following on 09/09/2010 05:19 PM Pacific Time:
> When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release
> Candidate on 2010-09-16.
>
==================================================
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting
==================================================
Meeting started by poelcat at 16:02:33 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-09-10/fedora-bugzappers.2010-09-10-16.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (poelcat, 16:02:51)
* attendees nirik adamw jlaska poelcat jsmith (poelcat, 16:05:37)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 (poelcat,
16:05:45)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 waiting
for a new build, needs to happen soon (poelcat, 16:07:25)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 (poelcat,
16:07:34)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 asking
mizmo to update the bug and remind design team of change deadline on
2010-09-14 (poelcat, 16:12:53)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 (poelcat,
16:13:08)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 need to
continue debugging before we can figure out where it needs to be
fixed (poelcat, 16:20:05)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 (poelcat,
16:20:22)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719
attempting to reproduce. If we cannot do so with TC1 testing will
close INSUFFICIENT_DATA (poelcat, 16:28:36)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 (poelcat,
16:28:41)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 fix is in
hand, maintainer expects to build new package tonight (poelcat,
16:45:36)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 (poelcat,
16:45:48)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 really
need more information from reporter; if no further information or
similiar reports by next week, will consider dropping (poelcat,
16:53:24)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 (poelcat,
16:53:32)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 fix and
new packages anticipated this weekend, needs testing by kde, xfce
and other desktops depending on HAL (poelcat, 17:05:05)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 (poelcat,
17:05:25)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 accepted
as a blocker, fixed needed no later than 2010-09-14 (poelcat,
17:14:11)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 (poelcat,
17:14:18)
* ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 accepted
blocker; need to ammend blocker criteria to be more specific, devel
believes it's an easy fix they expect to make soon (poelcat,
17:25:40)
* open discussion (poelcat, 17:25:44)
* ACTION: jlaska to propose adjusting beta release criteria to
accomodate rescue-mode + networking (see 632510) (jlaska, 17:26:18)
Meeting ended at 17:31:28 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 waiting for a new
build, needs to happen soon
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 asking mizmo to
update the bug and remind design team of change deadline on 2010-09-14
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 need to continue
debugging before we can figure out where it needs to be fixed
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 attempting to
reproduce. If we cannot do so with TC1 testing will close
INSUFFICIENT_DATA
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 fix is in hand,
maintainer expects to build new package tonight
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 really need more
information from reporter; if no further information or similiar
reports by next week, will consider dropping
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 fix and new
packages anticipated this weekend, needs testing by kde, xfce and
other desktops depending on HAL
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 accepted as a
blocker, fixed needed no later than 2010-09-14
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 accepted blocker;
need to ammend blocker criteria to be more specific, devel believes
it's an easy fix they expect to make soon
* jlaska to propose adjusting beta release criteria to accomodate
rescue-mode + networking (see 632510)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jlaska
* jlaska to propose adjusting beta release criteria to accomodate
rescue-mode + networking (see 632510)
* **UNASSIGNED**
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 waiting for a new
build, needs to happen soon
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 asking mizmo to
update the bug and remind design team of change deadline on
2010-09-14
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 need to continue
debugging before we can figure out where it needs to be fixed
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 attempting to
reproduce. If we cannot do so with TC1 testing will close
INSUFFICIENT_DATA
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 fix is in hand,
maintainer expects to build new package tonight
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 really need more
information from reporter; if no further information or similiar
reports by next week, will consider dropping
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 fix and new
packages anticipated this weekend, needs testing by kde, xfce and
other desktops depending on HAL
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 accepted as a
blocker, fixed needed no later than 2010-09-14
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 accepted blocker;
need to ammend blocker criteria to be more specific, devel believes
it's an easy fix they expect to make soon
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (98)
* jlaska (82)
* poelcat (67)
* mezcalero (43)
* jsmith (21)
* buggbot (13)
* bcl (7)
* dlehman (7)
* Camberwell (6)
* nirik (4)
* zodbot (3)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
More information about the devel
mailing list