fedpkg workflow and release numbers

[Christoph Höger]

Hi all,

since I keep offlineimap the same version for the latest stable (that I
got my hands on) + devel versions, my fedpkg workflow looks like:

1. master> build package

2. f14> git pull origin master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build ...

3. f13> git pull origin master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build ...

I think this is how git should be used in that case (no difference
between all branches). But this means taking the release number from
step 1 through all steps (e.g. building offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14 without
ever building offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14). Is that ok in terms of fedora
package policies?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100919/f4aa5f9e/attachment.bin