1000 Bug reports
James Laska
jlaska at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 19:55:18 UTC 2010
Greetings,
This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion! I've cc'd the test@ list
as well since I think this is of value there.
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
> report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
> take a look at my statistics.
>
> First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
> Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
> Most bugs filed in a day: 7
> 7 2008-03-18
> 7 2009-03-17
> (Hmm, what is it about the ides of March! (probably testing new releases))
> Top months:
> 29 2009-03
> 33 2008-03
> By year:
> 1 2002
> 5 2003
> 18 2004
> 123 2005
> 198 2006
> 145 2007
> 197 2008
> 192 2009
I'm wondering if this was related to the anaconda storage re-write?
That doesn't explain the similar numbers from previous years, but it
would be interesting+difficult to map these trends to releases/features.
> 121 2010 (a little slow to hit my ~200/year pace)
>
> Top components:
> 19 autofs (we automount home and data dirs)
> 21 NetworkManager
> 32 selinux-policy-targeted
> 73 Package Review
> 91 selinux-policy ( I like quiet logwatch reports! )
> 104 kernel
> 112 anaconda (I do a lot of automated installs)
I've said this to you before, but I'll say it again ... thank you for
your contributions to Fedora installation validation.
> 6 palindrome bugs:
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785
Heh, cute statistic. It's a shame there are no door prizes for the
number of palindrome bugs. Otherwise, you would win them. :P
> Open:
> 24 ASSIGNED
> 4 MODIFIED
> 73 NEW
> 4 ON_QA
>
> Resolved:
> "valid":
> 10 CLOSED CANTFIX
> 134 CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
> 2 CLOSED DEFERRED
> 75 CLOSED ERRATA
> 125 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
> 265 CLOSED RAWHIDE
> 19 CLOSED UPSTREAM
>
> "invalid":
> 70 CLOSED DUPLICATE
> 8 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
> 99 CLOSED NOTABUG
> 70 CLOSED WONTFIX
> 18 CLOSED WORKSFORME
>
> So 26.5% (so far) of my reports are no so useful. I shall have to try harder!
I don't think I'd call them 'not useful'. I subscribe to having more
data, than no data. Of course, as a maintainer I've never had to
DUPLICATE a large number of bugs. Your duplicate numbers above, while
yes they add time spent triaging and duplicating related issues, they
also impress upon the prevalence of the problem.
> Here's to the next 1000!
Congrats and cheers! :)
Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100929/f665553a/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list