critpath approval process seems rather broken
Tomasz Torcz
tomek at pipebreaker.pl
Sat Apr 9 10:57:19 UTC 2011
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Will Woods wrote:
> > In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
> > with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
> > testing, so other stuff gets tested first.
>
> The fact is, this is a SECURITY UPDATE and as such it should go out even
> without testing. It's not acceptable to sit on security updates for weeks.
No, security updates are not _that_ special. For example, there's
an avahi update in pipeline. It has broken dependencies. Pushing this
would broke some systems. I'm talking about:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avahi-0.6.27-6.fc14
--
Tomasz Torcz "God, root, what's the difference?"
xmpp: zdzichubg at chrome.pl "God is more forgiving."
More information about the devel
mailing list